Weekly Thoughts

VIEW ALL POSTS

Nevermind Success

Here is something that caught our eye this week:

Another lesson from Nirvana

A couple of weeks ago, we wrote the about the lessons we learned from Sub Pop Records’ signing of Nirvana.  This week, we wanted to highlight a related story, which has more to do with Nirvana than Sub Pop.

Bruce Pavitt and Jonathan Poneman, Sub Pop’s founders, saw talent in Nirvana and figured out a way to sign the band and release their first album – Bleach – in 1989.  However, only a short time later in 1990, Nirvana actually left Sub Pop to join Geffen Records, a major record label.  In 1991, Nirvana released their second album – Nevermind – which kick-started the popularization of the grunge movement.

We missed the Nirvana craze by a couple of years, but Kurt Cobain, Nirvana’s lead singer, remains an iconic figure regardless of your generation.  As we did more research, what we found most interesting was his unwavering belief in his own success, even in the early days when he was part of a band nobody had ever heard of.

When Nirvana was with Sub Pop, their success was framed within the context of the indie world.  Their album, Bleach, sold about 40,000 copies in its first year, and from Sub Pop’s perspective, it was considered a fantastic outcome.  However, Cobain had a different perspective.  Pavitt explains:

“I thought they were going to be really successful, but our metric for success was much more modest than even the band’s and that’s what actually got us into trouble…. Kurt would tell me regularly  – we should be selling a million of these.  And I’d be going, you don’t understand! And boy did I not know what I was talking about.”

Dissatisfied with Sub Pop’s limited worldview, Nirvana shopped around and found a partner who shared their ambition. Interestingly, joining Geffen was a major break with convention.  At the time, it was very rare for a band to go to a major from the indie system.  But Cobain had other plans. Pavitt again:

“I remember Kurt saying you should be selling a million of these. He was very confident in his abilities. He was many things – he was a complicated individual –  but he had a bedrock confidence and desire to be successful.” 

Cobain’s definition of success was not limited to the indie world, but rather focused on the music industry at large.  And his band achieved it.  With their new partner, the album became number one on the US Billboard 200, and by 1992, they were selling up to 300,000 copies a week.  Today, that album has sold over 30 million copies.

For Chenmark, the lesson is that mental models matter.  If success means being the biggest company in your industry in your city that’s a perfectly fine goal.  However, success can also be defined as being the biggest company in your industry, regardless of geography.  It could also mean not being the biggest company, but the most profitable, or the one with the best cash flow yield.  The point is, we have a choice for how we define success.  And regardless of whatever mental model we choose, we must always remember to surround ourselves with people who have similar definitions of success, even if that means making some hard choices.

Have a great week,

Your Chenmark Team

Subscribe to Weekly Thoughts

Previous Post Next Post

Recent Posts

It’s Basically 1200 Meters

When we lived in Cambridge, we frequented all the common outdoor exercise spots — leisurely jogs along the Charles, grueling stairs in the Harvard Stadium, and heart-rate spiking intervals on the Newton hills.  As such, we enjoyed learning more about the “Tempo Loop” in the Harvard Athletic Complex. 

Read More

I Said No F*ing Brown M&Ms!

While we are more of a Smarties group, we were interested to learn this week that brown M&M's carry relevant significance despite being the worst color for a candy variety.  They are also the most notable thing about a backstage concert rider — the legal document that outlines terms for concert promoters — for Van Halen’s 1982 World Tour.

Read More

Cash Money

Our regular readers will know that our metric of choice is Free Cash Flow.  This is because the crux of our strategy relies upon our ability to purchase cash flowing businesses from retiring owners, and then, over the long-term, using the cash flows from those businesses to fund the equity requirements for growth—whether it be supporting internal growth initiatives or writing a check for our next acquisition.  Without free cash flow, our strategy stalls. 

Read More