Weekly Thoughts


Pitbulls vs. Cocker Spaniels

Here is something that caught our eye this week:

What type of person can add the most value to a board?

At the moment, our firm does not have any third party equity investors.  We’ve taken that tact deliberately, as we have opted for a relatively slower pace of growth than we might otherwise achieve if we used external capital to fund deal activity. That said, when our group speaks about the potential benefits of external capital, it has less to do with ‘going fast’ and more to do with access to advice and information.  As a relatively young and inexperienced group, we can see the appeal in having an advisory board to turn to for candid feedback on our performance and conversation about our blind spots.  Of course, the underlying assumption here is that our group of advisers would be providing, well, good advice.

As this is a topic we have been pondering, we were interested to see thoughts from Warren Buffett on the topic of independent directors as it relates to acquisitions.  Spoiler alert, Buffett believes many of these directors are not serving companies well, as they are generally incentivized to play nice and avoid dissension.  As summarized by The NYTimes:

“When it comes to acquisitions that C.E.O.s want to make, independent directors are supposed to check their impulses.  But corporate chiefs rarely bring in outside advisers who provide dissenting opinions, so the deals usually happen. “When seeking directors, C.E.O.s don’t look for pit bulls,” Mr. Buffett writes. “It’s the cocker spaniel that gets taken home.” Too many directors covet the pay that comes with serving on a corporate board, playing nice with a C.E.O. to keep their jobs and get a good reference for more directorships. If a director pushes back on a C.E.O.’s deal proposal, “his or her candidacy will silently die.”

Buffett goes on to argue that although not considered independent from a corporate governance perspective, directors who own stakes in the companies they are advising are often in a better position to provide balanced advice, since they will actually suffer the consequences of poor decisions.

The general point is that companies can benefit from establishing a culture in which people with skin in the game have the freedom to challenge consensus and offer alternate perspectives, sometimes aggressively.  We are fortunate that this type of spirited debate happens regularly within our existing leadership group, and this dynamic is something that we’ll try to maintain should we bring on advisers in the future.

Have a great week,

Your Chenmark Team

Subscribe to Weekly Thoughts

Previous Post Next Post

Recent Posts

I Said No F*ing Brown M&Ms!

While we are more of a Smarties group, we were interested to learn this week that brown M&M's carry relevant significance despite being the worst color for a candy variety.  They are also the most notable thing about a backstage concert rider — the legal document that outlines terms for concert promoters — for Van Halen’s 1982 World Tour.

Read More

Cash Money

Our regular readers will know that our metric of choice is Free Cash Flow.  This is because the crux of our strategy relies upon our ability to purchase cash flowing businesses from retiring owners, and then, over the long-term, using the cash flows from those businesses to fund the equity requirements for growth—whether it be supporting internal growth initiatives or writing a check for our next acquisition.  Without free cash flow, our strategy stalls. 

Read More

It’s the Little Things

We’ve written previously about Admiral William McRaven’s popular 2014 University of Texas at Austin Commencement address, which argued that “if you want to change the world, start off by making your bed.”  He goes on to say that if you begin your day accomplishing one small task to perfection, you will be encouraged to go on to accomplish another task well, and then another, and then another, so on and so forth.  By the end of the day, you’ll probably have accomplished a lot. 

Read More